The decision of three directors to resign from the board at Dundee has been described as a "bombshell" by one of their former colleagues, but he remains hopeful that they can be convinced to reverse their decision and return to the club.
Steve Martin, Bill Colvin, and finance director Ian Crichton walked out earlier this week in protest at the refusal of the Dundee FC Supporters Society – which owns a 51% stake in the club –to accept a £700,000 takeover deal from an American consortium led by Texan businessman John Nelms.
Maurice Kidd, who is one of the three Supporters' Society representatives on the Dens Park board, has urged the trio to reconsider and intimated that discussions with the American consortium over investing in the club can still be progressed.
"It was a bit of a bombshell," said Kidd, who has been left on the board alongside fellow Supporters' Society representatives Dave Forbes and Fraser MacDonald. "I got a phone call at 7am and then turned the computer on to find out the news. What I would say is that I would strongly urge the other three directors to consider their position.
"The dialogue has to continue. I personally emailed Bill Colvin and still feel the proposal on the table can be progressed if there is a bit of understanding on both sides."
Kidd has treated the bid cautiously since his club has suffered administration twice in its history as a result of financial mismanagement, but stressed he was not opposed to outside investment. He has met with prospective new owner Nelms but wishes to examine his bid in more detail.
"We owe it to the supporters to do the proper checks and make sure everything is above board. That's the key to this whole thing," said Kidd. "[The meeting with Nelms] lasted four hours and he had many good points in his proposal. But I've just really said 'hello' to Tom Keyes, the other proposed investor, but that was about it."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article