SCOTTISH Secretary Ian Lang yesterday warned his party that a
rightward shift in policy -- ''that one revolution too far'' -- could
cost an unprecedented fifth term in office.
''We must avoid giving the appearance of being tired, of running out
of steam and of intellectual fatigue. At the same time, whilst remaining
radical, we have to avoid going that one revolution too far,'' he
declared.
Mr Lang, giving the Swinton Lecture to a Conservative Political Centre
summer school in York, used the occasion to back John Major's version of
Conservatism as the politics of ''common sense and instinct''.
In doing so, he issued a sharp reprimand to right wingers in the party
who have been critical of the apparent lack of a dominating ideology --
like Thatcherism -- in John Major's Government.
''I think it would be wrong, as you may guess, to settle on the
adoption of an ideological approach as the solution to our problems,''
Mr Lang said.
''An ideology is often the rationalising patina that is overlaid, in
hindsight, across a range of decisions and events that at the time were
much less certain in their outcome and much more pragmatic in their
development.
''Ideology can be a substitute for thought, and an
ideologically-driven party ultimately becomes a pastiche of itself,
entirely in the grip of ideologues applying, uncritically, yesterday's
answers to today's problems.''
In fending off the challenges of a revitalised Labour Party, which he
accused of stealing Conservative policies in their quest for office, the
Conservative Party had to deal with voters wanting change.
''We must be alert to the fact that there can develop in politics an
impulse for change which -- if unheeded -- can become inexorable.''
Mr Lang said that the Conservatives had to be the party of change for
the better, not change for the sake of it.
One of the achievements of Mrs Thatcher was to move the ''centre of
political gravity'' to the right, creating a new centre ground which the
Conservative Party's first task would be to hold against an encroaching,
modernised Labour Party.
The danger in a rightward lurch in philosophy would be the loss of
considerable sections of this centre ground to a Labour Party ''oozing
novelty'', making it very difficult to muster the necessary votes to
retain power, he said.
Accusing the Labour Party of shallowness and ''glossing over the
political landscape'', Mr Lang said that the guiding principles of
mainstream Conservatism, a creed ''which begins with the individual'',
had to be continually re-emphasised to combat voter boredom with the
Conservative Party after its 15-year hegemony.
This emphasis on the individual is part of a claimed decentralising
ethos inherent in Mr Lang's Conservatism, which he described as
''politics on a human scale''.
Central to this Conservatism was a sense of community, which Mr Lang
claimed his party fosters and Socialism undermines.
The Scottish Secretary also sought to present the caring side of
Conservatism.
His prescription for the UK's social ills was not through direct
governmental action, but through a strengthening of the community.
He said: ''In that way we can end the exile from the community of
those people who feel so alienated and apart from it -- the poorly
educated, demotivated youths without jobs and, it seems, without
prospects. Their alienation is a threat to the community -- but it is
the community which can embrace them and end the threat.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article