Row erupts between Labour and Lib Dems over schools shake-up (From Essex County Standard)
Get involved: send your pictures, video, news and views by texting ECS to 80360, or email »
Thomas Lord Audley campaign sparks political row
8:50pm Tuesday 4th May 2010 in News By James Calnan
LABOUR and Lib Dem campaigners are engaged in a war of words over who is campaigning hardest to keep a popular secondary school open.
Labour activists have criticised a Lib Dem leaflet distributed in Berechurch ward, claiming Labour has “given up” on attempts to save Thomas Lord Audley School.
Essex County Council wants to close it, along with Alderman Blaxill School as part of a £100million-plus shake-up of secondary education in Colchester.
A vocational college for 14 to 19-year-olds has been mooted for the Thomas Lord Audley School site, but many fear the £100million earmarked for the scheme will be cut as part of the next Government’s package to reduce the budget deficit.
Jordan Newell, Labour’s candidate in Colchester, stressed he was still fighting to keep secondary education at Thomas Lord Audley, which is within the Berechurch ward.
He said: “I have not given up the fight. We want some form of secondary education retained on that site.
“We will keep fighting and we will do our lobbying.”
However, Lib Dem candidate Bob Russell was unrepentant and is standing by the leaflet, which accused Labour of “sacrificing” the two schools because it supports county council plans to replace Sir Charles Lucas Arts College, in Greenstead with an academy.
He said: “I’m still fighting for Thomas Lord Audley to remain an 11 to 16 school.
“There is a world of difference between a vocational college for the over-14s and a secondary school for 11 to 16-year-olds.
“They’re two totally different educational establishments.”
Mr Newell responded he supported plans to keep Thomas Lord Audley open, set out in so-called “option four” proposals, which would put it in a federation with Stanway School.
Comments(6)
crosby
says...
12:24am Wed 5 May 10
The Liberal Democrats say they want to keep the school open.
Spot the difference - whose are the weasel words?
Boris
says...
1:49am Wed 5 May 10
The Lib Dem portfolio holders fought well for months but then they caved in when Tim Young threatened to ditch them and go into coalition with the Tories. So they went along with the access road to Philip Morant which was a key feature in implementing the Bonkers plan.
All parties represented on Colchester BC (Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems and High Woods "independents") have behaved despicably on this, the most important local issue in recent times.
The only politician to have maintained his integrity on this issue is Bob Russell.
Greenstead tenant
says...
7:25am Wed 5 May 10
RitchieHicks
says...
10:23am Wed 5 May 10
Boris
says...
1:06pm Wed 5 May 10
By dominating our local Labour Party, and getting their better rivals expelled, the Youngs have pushed Labour to the margin of political life. But as long as they can deliver 6 to 8 councillors, they hold the balance and can switch their coalition allegiance from Lib Dem to Tory at any time.
Voter99 says...
9:07pm Tue 4 May 10
.