Colchester High Street car ban trial to start in November

A TRIAL ban on cars using Colchester High Street will be launched in November.

Highways officers from Essex County Council have been carrying out checks in the town centre.

An engineer told a source the preliminary works were in preparation for a ban on all vehicles, except buses, bikes and taxis, using the High Street during the day.

County Hall has refused to release further details of the trial.

Opposition to a permanent ban during a consultation in March was so great county council bosses told Colchester Council it could only go ahead after a public inquiry.

A temporary ban is not expected to require an inquiry and will allow the authorities to make changes, if problems arise.

Businesses opposed the proposals because delivery vehicles would be barred from 10am to 6pm Monday to Saturday, while disabled campaigners said the loss of parking spaces would affect their ability to shop in the town centre.

Ron Levy, secretary of Colchester Retail/Business Association, said he believed a car ban would reduce congestion dramatically.

But he added: “If a trial scheme includes a ban on cars and delivery vehicles, then we would be extremely unhappy with that. We hope common sense will prevail.”

Michael Rance, of East Stockwell Street, opposes the plan because it would make his street a two-way road by moving bollards up to the junction with the High Street.

He said: “There is no great difference between the pavement and the road on East Stockwell Street, so in effect all our doors would open directly on to any traffic.”

Essex County Council was unable to say if delivery vehicles and blue badge holders would be able to use the High Street under the temporary ban.

In a statement, a spokesman said: “Essex County Council and Colchester Council are working together to deliver transport improvements in Colchester town centre. These improvements include proposals for traffic restrictions in the town centre.”

Comments(31)

Scoot says...
2:14pm Fri 7 Sep 12

so let me get this straight improvements to transport means closing a street which is a vital artery because of the shambles of a transport system around it......Ipswich here I come...

Checkout says...
2:40pm Fri 7 Sep 12

Bye!

The REAL Norm says...
2:55pm Fri 7 Sep 12

The lunatics are running the asylum

hughie-s says...
3:48pm Fri 7 Sep 12

They have refused to release further details of the trial, why? My guess is they haven't a clue how to implement it and it will all be the Borough's fault when it goes wrong, meanwhile CBC will be blaming County.

SamEssex says...
4:07pm Fri 7 Sep 12

So I Can't access my Private parking space in town. Without driving around scenic route which no doubt is going to end up ungodly busy.

SamEssex says...
4:07pm Fri 7 Sep 12

So I Can't access my Private parking space in town. Without driving around scenic route which no doubt is going to end up ungodly busy.

romantic says...
4:54pm Fri 7 Sep 12

I say give it a go for a few months and see how it goes. Better to do it this way than spend millions re-building everything. But we need to give it a while before deciding it has or hasn´t worked.

Of course some people will be grumbling about it, but we need to move away from everything being centred on the car. Air quality is not an especially "sexy" subject, but the High Street is pretty polluted when the traffic is jammed up.

I do think we need to move towards the High Street being fully pedestrianised, with access only to emergency vehicles. But that is perhaps a longer term thing.

Reginald47 says...
5:06pm Fri 7 Sep 12

The High Street hasn't been a 'vital artery' for years and as romantic says air quality has now reached unacceptably low standards.

Bigh321 says...
5:32pm Fri 7 Sep 12

What a bunch of idiots. Who on earth approved this stupid idea. At peak shopping time too!

omgwtfbbq says...
6:07pm Fri 7 Sep 12

I'm another disabled shopper that will be going to Ipswich instead.

there are also a number of charity shops in the high street that rely on donations being dropped off in the day, these will not be able to function when the road is shut,

A trial is not needed the high street has shut for a number of events in the past and shops have already reported massive losses on them days.

Simon Taylor says...
6:34pm Fri 7 Sep 12

romantic wrote:
I say give it a go for a few months and see how it goes. Better to do it this way than spend millions re-building everything. But we need to give it a while before deciding it has or hasn´t worked.

Of course some people will be grumbling about it, but we need to move away from everything being centred on the car. Air quality is not an especially "sexy" subject, but the High Street is pretty polluted when the traffic is jammed up.

I do think we need to move towards the High Street being fully pedestrianised, with access only to emergency vehicles. But that is perhaps a longer term thing.
I agree with romantic. A sensible trial period is the way forwards and some solutions to perceived problems will be found through necessity, but I do wonder at the secrecy surrounding the whole thing.

While we're at it, we could trial a change in the direction of traffic in Priory Street, with sensibly timed traffic lights, to further reduce the number of cars in Queen Street.

Boris says...
6:51pm Fri 7 Sep 12

SamEssex wrote:
So I Can't access my Private parking space in town. Without driving around scenic route which no doubt is going to end up ungodly busy.
Can't you get to work before 10 am?

CJ1989 says...
9:27pm Fri 7 Sep 12

I can't believe they're actually going ahead with this, I was hoping it had been killed off quietly.

I'd happily give up the convenience of driving down the high street for a proper, fully pedestrianised street, like Chelmsford. But to ban it to cars, while allowing buses, bikes, and taxis just seems absurd. All of the inconvenience, but none of the benefits of a pedestrianised high street.

I wish whoever is in charge (it's still a lib-lab coalition isn't it?) would make up their mind about what to do with the town centre. While they're messing about deciding on how to not-quite-pedestrian
ise the high street, and whether the retail should be in the town or out-of-town, shops are closing and businesses are going elsewhere.

I'll be interested to see how this trial turns out, but I'm guessing it'll be exactly as it is now, but that little bit less convenient.

burlyb says...
12:38pm Sat 8 Sep 12

the only LOW standards in all of this are the people who think they know best for this town....half of them are libDIM's and the other are suit wearers who have not got a clue what day it is let alone any practical hands on "past experience" of anything worthwhile...you can NOT route around a town on a hill you useless mugs....wake up and smell the coffee....this is going to be more of MY tax £'s down the ever widening drain and it's all due to wasters who really have no idea of practicalities

network driver says...
5:05pm Sat 8 Sep 12

About time this was trialed. Hats off to whoever came up with the idea, as it most certainly couldn't have come from anyone in our own council, they've all been bought off long ago!

wellnow says...
7:55am Sun 9 Sep 12

people will get used to what ever they do.robotic compliance is the norm these days.free bus travel for all should be included in project.

TheCaptain says...
11:31am Mon 10 Sep 12

burlyb wrote:
the only LOW standards in all of this are the people who think they know best for this town....half of them are libDIM's and the other are suit wearers who have not got a clue what day it is let alone any practical hands on "past experience" of anything worthwhile...you can NOT route around a town on a hill you useless mugs....wake up and smell the coffee....this is going to be more of MY tax £'s down the ever widening drain and it's all due to wasters who really have no idea of practicalities
as long as you know best hey.

network driver says...
11:45am Mon 10 Sep 12

burlyb wrote:
the only LOW standards in all of this are the people who think they know best for this town....half of them are libDIM's and the other are suit wearers who have not got a clue what day it is let alone any practical hands on "past experience" of anything worthwhile...you can NOT route around a town on a hill you useless mugs....wake up and smell the coffee....this is going to be more of MY tax £'s down the ever widening drain and it's all due to wasters who really have no idea of practicalities
mug!!!

icecoolmark says...
7:55pm Tue 11 Sep 12

Ive never been stuck in 'traffic' on the high street! who makes this stuff up? I moved here from Kent 9 years ago, I think i'd like to go back please. At least they seem sensible and the countryside is nicer there!

network driver says...
8:02pm Tue 11 Sep 12

icecoolmark wrote:
Ive never been stuck in 'traffic' on the high street! who makes this stuff up? I moved here from Kent 9 years ago, I think i'd like to go back please. At least they seem sensible and the countryside is nicer there!
Never been stuck in traffic in the high street? Ain't you the lucky one!

Truth be told, its the travesty that is "east gates" and "network rail" that itself and itself alone gridlocks our town.

jut1972 says...
8:42pm Tue 11 Sep 12

I really dont get what this is supposed to achieve. Shoppers wont come to Colchester because it is now slightly easier to cross one street.

A trial is sensible but CBC should be upfront and give some good reasons why they are doing this.

burlyb says...
10:51pm Tue 11 Sep 12

network driver wrote:
icecoolmark wrote: Ive never been stuck in 'traffic' on the high street! who makes this stuff up? I moved here from Kent 9 years ago, I think i'd like to go back please. At least they seem sensible and the countryside is nicer there!
Never been stuck in traffic in the high street? Ain't you the lucky one! Truth be told, its the travesty that is "east gates" and "network rail" that itself and itself alone gridlocks our town.
prize cunet

burlyb says...
10:53pm Tue 11 Sep 12

TheCaptain wrote:
burlyb wrote: the only LOW standards in all of this are the people who think they know best for this town....half of them are libDIM's and the other are suit wearers who have not got a clue what day it is let alone any practical hands on "past experience" of anything worthwhile...you can NOT route around a town on a hill you useless mugs....wake up and smell the coffee....this is going to be more of MY tax £'s down the ever widening drain and it's all due to wasters who really have no idea of practicalities
as long as you know best hey.
another one who sports a full beard and talks like one

rlee51 says...
11:59pm Tue 11 Sep 12

If the trafic ban started at East Stockwell Street, all vehicles would enter the top of the high street but cars and lorries would have to turn left and go down West Stockwell Street.

Then all the bays in the High Street after West Stockwell Street could be used for disabled parking.

These bays could be accssed via St Nicholas Street, Maidenbough Street, Williams Walk and West Stockwell Street.

However, during a trial period Disable Badge Holders would be able to access those bays by driving down the High Street.

This way, lorries could still make deliveries during the ban, disabled can access the High Street and there would still be a reduction in the polution levels.

romantic says...
9:01am Wed 12 Sep 12

rlee51 wrote:
If the trafic ban started at East Stockwell Street, all vehicles would enter the top of the high street but cars and lorries would have to turn left and go down West Stockwell Street.

Then all the bays in the High Street after West Stockwell Street could be used for disabled parking.

These bays could be accssed via St Nicholas Street, Maidenbough Street, Williams Walk and West Stockwell Street.

However, during a trial period Disable Badge Holders would be able to access those bays by driving down the High Street.

This way, lorries could still make deliveries during the ban, disabled can access the High Street and there would still be a reduction in the polution levels.
You seriously want to route all the traffic down through the Dutch Quarter? Do you not remember the regular times when trucks are stuck down there because their sat navs send them that way?

The traffic ban as mooted would allow deliveries to be made before 10.00. This works for plenty of other towns, no reason why it cannot work here.

At the moment, although you can´t see it, the town centre is a polluted place, and that is fully down to the traffic.

Long-term, we need to move towards a completely vehicle-free High Street, it would be a cleaner and much nicer place.

mattym1983 says...
7:08pm Wed 12 Sep 12

Simon Taylor wrote:
romantic wrote:
I say give it a go for a few months and see how it goes. Better to do it this way than spend millions re-building everything. But we need to give it a while before deciding it has or hasn´t worked.

Of course some people will be grumbling about it, but we need to move away from everything being centred on the car. Air quality is not an especially "sexy" subject, but the High Street is pretty polluted when the traffic is jammed up.

I do think we need to move towards the High Street being fully pedestrianised, with access only to emergency vehicles. But that is perhaps a longer term thing.
I agree with romantic. A sensible trial period is the way forwards and some solutions to perceived problems will be found through necessity, but I do wonder at the secrecy surrounding the whole thing.

While we're at it, we could trial a change in the direction of traffic in Priory Street, with sensibly timed traffic lights, to further reduce the number of cars in Queen Street.
Been reading the post and i aggree this is a bad idear to close the high street to all i have worked in a charity shop in the town and it kneeds access tho the day with collections and delevierys.
So where is all the traffic ment to go up a very congested balkne hill down a very conjested southway.
lets just say i live priory st currently im come home 6.30 come off a12 down rembrance ave up north hill down high st qweens st home all very busy but i still make a good time.

Now close the high street to me i have to go bulkne hill- south way- magdelen street -brook street.
all currently very congested thats an extra hr travil there easy then east hill qweens st

Not just that but there r flatts above some of the shops on the high street if i lived there how can i park my car in my private space
and i saw what u said boris no i cant i start work 6pm no fxxking way am i gonna get there b4 10 am i dont get home till 7am on nights

mattym1983 says...
7:11pm Wed 12 Sep 12

Been reading the post and i aggree this is a bad idear to close the high street to all i have worked in a charity shop in the town and it kneeds access tho the day with collections and delevierys. So where is all the traffic ment to go up a very congested balkne hill down a very conjested southway.lets just say i live priory st currently im come home 6.30 come off a12 down rembrance ave up north hill down high st qweens st home all very busy but i still make a good time.Now close the high street to me i have to go bulkne hill- south way- magdelen street -brook street.all currently very congested thats an extra hr travil there easy then east hill qweens st Not just that but there r flatts above some of the shops on the high street if i lived there how can i park my car in my private spaceand i saw what u said boris no i cant i start work 6pm no fxxking way am i gonna get there b4 10 am i dont get home till 7am on nights

mattym1983 says...
7:13pm Wed 12 Sep 12

No idear why or how i ended up quoting some1 with that post

Sidney Harbour-Bridge says...
8:46pm Wed 12 Sep 12

“Essex County Council and Colchester Council are working together to deliver transport improvements in Colchester town centre. These improvements include proposals for traffic restrictions in the town centre.”

But not with anyone else it would seem

rhetoric says...
9:42am Fri 14 Sep 12

mattym1983, if for example you lived in Priory St, you could walk to work?
.
If you have something heavy to take there, you could use a sack barrow or garden wheeled conveyor of some kind!
.
The time you save when not sitting in self-imposed traffic snarls you could spend on literacy classes! You might then make more of an impact/ impression on other posters.
.
If the Town Centre in Colchester is represented by your sort of person with your sort of "logic", no wonder things are in a mess.

suvvers2003 says...
12:53pm Sun 16 Sep 12

This has been an on off argument for years. I don't personally see the problem - it works in many other town and city centres across the country. In other towns and cities shops manage to get their deliveries during the times traffic is allowed in these areas therefore I don't see that as a viable argument. As for the blue badge brigade - if some (and yes I know it's a minority of them) parked their cars sensibly instead of just abandoning them at the side of the road (quite often both sides of the road just as High Street narrows near Jessops/Cash Converters) thus causing a huge bottle-neck then maybe, just maybe it wouldn't have come to this. Then there is the argument that many many cars use High Street just to avoid using the ring road. Quite often I have followed traffic up North Hill, down High Street and Queen Street to St Botolphs roundabout and watched them go to either Magdalen Street or Mersea Road. This unnecessary use of High Street has also quite clearly contributed to the proposed traffic ban.

But, despite all the good reasons for banning traffic from High Street, I do have reservations. There is a lot of traffic using High Street all day and that traffic would have to go somewhere. And since the road infrastructure around Colchester is so appallingly bad say hello to massive congestion on Balkerne Hill, Southway, Magdalen Street, Brook Street, East Street, Ipswich Road, and Cowdray Avenue!

Good luck Colchester, I'm glad I don't work there any more

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree