Report this comment
  • "Point 1: We must assume that the majority of the recruits know what they are signing to. If not, the assessors at the recruiting offices have to be held negligent, which I don't think is true.
    .
    Point 2: Point 1 means that they are aware that if there is a war or conflict of any kind, they could be seriously dead or injured. It is part of being a fighting/defence force. Not that we aren't grateful, but hey, you should have read the not so small print, boys. That includes the bit about the wages!
    .
    Point 3: There is a good remark above about what happened to servicemen from previous conflicts. So many of the veterans are now dying, very old and helpless, and who gives a **** about them? Only their families and loved ones. They are cruelly treated at times, and there is nobody to champion them and their families. They had to go, no voluntary side to their service, although many I know went before they were called. For this they got a pittance, did as they were told, and were proud to serve. It is amazing that few of them suffered ptsd or whatever it is now termed. If they did turn out a bit gruff or antisocial post-war, it was put down to "what they've been through" and they had to get on with life, albeit with some sympathy for those who knew about them.
    .
    Some of the worst treated even felt sorry for their abusers, as in the cases I knew of ex-Jap prisoners who had been starved and driven to extremes, coming home as living skeletons. Those I knew gloried in their "second life" and gave thanks for the chance denied to so many.
    .
    It's not that we're ungrateful, we do need to be free from fear of oppression by other nations and creeds which are not our choice, but do give a breathing space to the rest of the population and their problems.
    .
    Give precedence and rewards to the returning serviceman of today, and the same should be available, readily and without question, to those of yesteryear,
    but you'll find most of those still able to protest, would say no thank you, we will soldier on as we have always done, just allow us a bit of respect from time to time."
  • This field is mandatory
  • This field is mandatory
  • Please note we will not accept reports with HTML tags or URLs in them.


  • Enter the above word in the box below

Please be fair, courteous and respectful to the views of others so we can build a vibrant community in a safe online environment. You are personal liable for your comments and action will be taken against anyone who offends, ridicules or posts malicious and damaging views. If you wish to complain, please contact us.

Sir Bob calls for extra housing for former soldiers

Sir Bob calls for extra housing for former soldiers Sir Bob calls for extra housing for former soldiers

COLCHESTER MP Sir Bob Russell has called on the Government to build more homes in garrison towns for former soldiers.

Speaking in the House of Commons he told defence ministers the armed forces covenant had committed the Government to housing personnel leaving the armed forces.

He also called on Department for Communities and Local Government to provide more money for homes in areas where large garrisons are.

Speaking after the defence debate, Sir Bob said: “The reality is that we, as a country, need to spend more on building and providing low cost rented accommodation not only for our civilian families but also for the families of military families who are leaving HM Armed Forces.

“The situation is likely to be made more serious if there are compulsory redundancies from Colchester Garrison.”

Currently there is no requirement for local authorities to give any preference to military families.

Local Businesses

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree