News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Colchester Hospital University NHS Foundation Trust resigns over 'angel' ban

A HEALTH trust member has stepped down after a support group at Colchester General Hospital was told it could not refer to stillborn babies as angels.

Peter Villiers-Tuthill was so outraged by the midwife’s objection, he has rescinded his membership at Colchester Hospital University NHS Foundation Trust.

He signed up in October after an operation at the Turner Road hospital, but now said he wanted nothing to do with the trust.

Whisperers, a group founded by Michelle Taylor, of Salvia Close, Clacton, created angel parent bags to give to bereaved mothers.

They include two teddies – one for the baby and one for the parents – a candle, toiletries and information about support groups.

But the trust said it could not use the word angel because it might offend non-religious families.

Mr Villiers-Tuthill, 69, from Clacton, said: “I don’t want anything to do with them because of their attitude towards the charity.

“The senior midwife, who objected to this, seems to have little idea about how religions react to things.

“I worked in the Middle East for a number of years, and if you go to any of the shopping malls in Dubai, or Abu Dhabi, over Christmas, they are full of decorations and the local children and their parents are first in line to see Father Christmas.

“These ill-informed people at the hospital make these decisions without really giving them any thought. I have withdrawn my membership in protest.”

Mark Prentice, spokesman for the trust, said: “We are always very disappointed to lose any public members because we are always looking to recruit, but obviously it is his decision and we respect that.”

The trust has 6,540 public members, who can help to make decisions through the Members’ Council.

Comments(7)

Voter99 says...
6:17pm Sat 26 Jun 10

Sounds like Communists have infected the Trust

tcw says...
7:59pm Sat 26 Jun 10

Well done Mr Villiers-Tuthill for taking a stand against such stupidity.

Feisty CBC says...
10:11pm Sat 26 Jun 10

Mr. Villiers-Tuthill well done sir :)

Pause says...
10:34pm Sat 26 Jun 10

Why should a group or person be able to label another person's dead baby with a name? That's what the Trust is making a stand on: the fact that no-one, however well-meaning, has the right to label another person's dead baby with the word "angel". The parent can call it what they want, but not some group. Hear hear to the Trust!

cavillas says...
10:16am Sun 27 Jun 10

The group has no ulterior motive they are trying to be caring and understanding in such cases. more so then certain midwives seem to be, they just treat it as a job and no longer a privilaged vocation.

Heinz says...
10:59am Sun 27 Jun 10

Interesting that 'the senior midwife' was not named in this story.
.
I wonder why?

silly things says...
7:01pm Sun 27 Jun 10

Heinz, i think you'll find the senior midwife was named in the story in the papers, just not online.

click2find

Most popular